Ecologists in Action regrets the decision of the UN and opposes military intervention in Libya to hide economic and geostrategic interests. It also requires that Gaddafi is tried for the crime, corruption and repression committed against his people.
The order shows that military intervention has already begun is to protect civilians in Libya. However, it is hard to believe when the same countries involved have shown that attitude, even a strong condemnation in recent cases in which there have been gross human rights violations on civilians: Serve as an example the approximately 1400 Palestinians killed by Israel's bombing Cast Lead intervention took place only two years ago, the Saharawi camp eviction Izik Gdaim in Laayoune few months ago, the repression of the people of Bahrain, or the murders and forced displacements of population (more than 40,000 people only in December 2010) in Sudan, whose president, Al Bashir is accused of committing crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur.
countries themselves willing to intervene militarily now, have supported Gaddafi's dictatorship for years, have bought oil and gas in Libya for years and have sold weapons to Libya for years. This is without question at any time its undemocratic nature, much less the suffering of the population. These these countries have shown their "prudence" when it comes to supporting democratic revolutions in all Maghreb countries whose anti-democratic regimes have supported without hesitation as they've served to defend their legitimate interests recently. It is an intervention in favor of democracy but for economic and geostrategic interests.
who suffers military intervention is the civilian population, as shown in the cases of previous surgery. The damage and suffering caused by the war that result in displacement, wounded and dead, fear and destruction of the environment are always suffered more by the civilian population. Of Indeed, after the bombing started, thousands of people fleeing. Ordinary people, who leave behind their homes and their lives, forcibly displaced by the war.
Ecologists in Action rejects anti-democratic regimes like Qaddafi and condemned human rights violations the Libyan people. For all require the Libyan regime is played. Also considers that in these situations is to speak out and act. Passivity can not be the answer but no military intervention. Ecopacifista organization believes that there are other more appropriate and effective methods of regulating conflict and civil disobedience, diplomatic or filing.
The "Operation Dawn Odyssey" seeks, therefore, protection of the Libyan population, it seeks to ensure respect for human rights nor democracy or freedom for its inhabitants. In addition, history has shown repeatedly as military interventions do not solve conflicts and sometimes severe, unleash violence increases or new military interventions. Examples of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq give us a picture of what follows is how to intervene in conflicts, with a high number of civilian casualties, continuing violations of human rights and dysfunctional societies with Western puppet governments that do not stand out precisely because of its democratic character.
Spain (and was not just the one), which since 2005 has sold arms worth 10.7 million euros to Libya and that during the first half of 2010, Libya exported military equipment worth 6.8 million euros, in addition to the intervention mobilizing some 500 soldiers, four fighter jets F-18, a tanker aircraft, an F-100 frigate, one submarine and maritime surveillance aircraft. It is hypocritical and irresponsible to attack the person who sold weapons to their advantage until a few months and also finance a war when you are proposed welfare cuts unwarranted and unprecedented in the interest of addressing the crisis and control public spending.
Therefore Ecologists in Action said it again loud and clear NO TO WAR!, NO MILITARY INTERVENTION IN LIBYA!
http://gerenaverde.blogspot.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment